Matrix Claims are Gettting Decision Letters

February 8th, 2024 I, a Pro Se litigant, received a communication from the trust and it stated that they were offering me $1,000 to sign over my rights to hold the Insurance companies and protected parties libel from harm. I told the trust to “GO BOY SCOUT THEMSELVES.”

A mere 10 months later, I get another communication from the trust stating that after the 90 days it took to show that my abuser was a youth when he started grooming and abusing me, and that he was an adult, still in a BSA uniform when the abuse ended, that now I qualify for a decision on where I landed in the “Matrix” of payout math.

The problem that I have with the trust’s poor decision making abilities up unto this point in time is that the insurance companies wrote these rules, and the victims of the actual rape are being discredited without even accepting basic facts in the math determination.

For instance, I know for a fact that my abuser harmed more than 10 children in my home town through Boy Scouts of America with at least 3 of them filing for this Bankruptcy claim, however the trust has my abuser listed as not having shown up on their side of the lists.

The trust now wants me, the victim of rape as a child to pay them, $1000 to prove that my abuser harmed more than just myself. If I disagree with this fee, I must fill out a financial statement form, under penalty of perjury that I can not afford to pay this fine to show that the trust errored in their decision making abilities.

So, the only fair thing to do is ask that the trust managers fill out a similar form, and show how much the insurance companies are paying these trust managers in retirement funds from being a former Texas Judge, not current, meaning we can not turn her in for malfeaseance to the Texas Commission of Judicial Conduct. We the victims would like to see a financial statement about how much each trust member is making for their role in denying victims of childhood sexual assault their Justice in this process.

I wrote an email back to the trust when they sent me a boiler plate response about how their math works.

“What I am asking is, how can I address each of the items in the matrix.
Namely that the offender was not involved in other “claims.”

I know my abuser has several other victims, and it does not matter that those kids, now adults did not file a claim. Especially when the BSA protocol is to remove initial complaints of CSA by it’s members or leaders.

There is a victim who is Pro Se who has filed evidence that the CFO of the BSA removed original claims from their listed property in the Bankruptcy and moved those original claims of abuse to a different address near the listed BSA properties.

Why has the trust not gone after those original claims of abuse?

I had to read more than 11,000 documents to know this information, why does the trust not leverage that information against the underwriters who dictated those actions and prove the trusts claim that the insurance agencies used bad faith in this entire proceeding?

How can I get paid for my time in representing myself and doing a better job than an attorney who represented 19,000 victims of CHILDHOOD SEXUAL ASSAULT?

How can I verify that your trust has done proper due diligence?

And how can I remove protected parties from the list. Meaning I will never agree to sign over my rights to 132 BAR associations from being protected from suit in libel claims.

I will NEVER sign over my rights to sue the Hospital that knew I was raped as a kid.

I will NEVER sign over my rights to the police, sheriff and courts to libel for knowing about my abuser assaulting other children. I was jailed for 177 days with no valid order, by the attorney who represented my abuser in the 90’s before he was a judge. A judge who was removed from the bench for signing his name to another judges case that gave a known sex offender her children back.

Patterns and practices are ignored of the BSA and their cadre.

Why are your attorneys for the trust (therefore the victims,) NOT doing their job and going after the maximum value of claims?

Why is my question about Andrew Van Arsdale’s California BAR grievance not showing up publicly?
And why is this trust not validating my claims that AVA and his cohorts signed YES to votes in the restructuring vote?
Also, what is the trust doing to ensure that victims of Childhood Sexual Assault who are incarcerated are actually having their rights protected with mail, blackmail, and if they were properly represented?

Your handling of this trust in a form of Justice for the victims is sad. Depressing. A travesty.

Rushing through our appeals as a matter of business. Again, GO BOY SCOUT YOURSELVES!”

“Delay, deny, defend” are not just words coming from a few insurance company executives emails, this is a pattern and practice that has been going on for a century. Bankrupting a human race, at the cost of our children’s innocence and safety. Protecting over 30,000 parties who knew about this abuse, but had the same insurance carriers as the Boy Scouts of America and the Catholic Church. All of this coming from a Congressionally sanctioned youth group. Will Kash Patel have the testicular fortitude to go after the 3 letter agencies who support human trafficking of Children? I personally informed him in writing in 2022 about Ken Paxton hiding these original claims of abuse from the Bankruptcy Court, and within 3 days Ken Paxton had a fake impeachment hearing where his mistress was about to testify, instead of having a hearing about these 135,000 original claims of childhood sexual assault. We shall see how complacent the federal governments police force is with these rapes of children whilst in a uniform, and why every police precinct and Aviation Wing is listed in the protected parties list.